Friends with Kids - 3 out of 5
During the marketing blitz for this movie--although the marketing of this movie hardly qualified as a "blitz" but "marketing meh" doesn't really have a tone of importance--the film was sold under the idea that if you enjoyed Bridesmaids -- and I did--you'll love this movie. The Amazon.com rationale. However, unlike Amazon, they could not have been more wrong because the tones of these two movies couldn't be more different. But, in a modern day ad agency's defense--we're not talking Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce here--they acted under the belief that because four stars of Bridesmaids made it into Friends with Kids, Americans would be simple enough to agree with the completely false assumption that the two movies are similar in their humor-language (a phrase I just made up).
|Including Richard Dawkins amazing book was almost enough for me to give this a 5 out of 5.|
The film centers around two friends; Jason and Julie, who's best friends--all married--are having kids and cultivating families while they prefer the single life. After experiencing the joy and unholy horrors that is the family life (vicariously through their friends), the two realize that they want a child without having to deal with a marriage or possible divorce--basically they want their cake and to date other cakes too. The two friends decide to bump uglies and create a baby together while remaining friends while they search out their soulmates. What could possibly go wrong? Obviously, the story twist you predict within the opening sentence of the film's synopsis...duh!
|Props to him for using the chopsticks. I'm too uncoordinated, so I use a fork.|
Friends with Kids is a so/so film. Other than being ridiculously predictable, the film never does too much wrong. Selling it as being "as funny as Bridesmaids" is a foolish idea because this film leans more towards the heavy emotional side as it deals with unstable marriages and relationships. That isn't to say it's not funny because the movie definitely has its moments. However, the film wasn't successful at balancing the funny and the heavy. In fact, the switch from laughs to fits of depression within the movie's tone is very noticeable--like a punch in the face. Finally, the movie has some odd notions about what it means to care for someone as the emphasis on what it means to love a person has more to do with their physical appearance and whether or not they make your naughty bits tingle rather than your heart go thump--but this idea can be more to do with the socially held concept that only attractive people deserve love...ironically, society got this idea because of the media through use of television shows, print ads and movies.
|Messed hair, loose tie...I know what they did! They excused themselves from |
dinner for a quick game of Twister.
The strongest aspect of this movie comes in the form of the performances. Adam Scott (Jason) shows he has what it takes to be a leading man in a--despite its heavy tones--is basically a romcom. Unlike most leading hunks in such films, he actually comes off as a realistic man, not the impossibly perfect studs that fill up this genre and gives women the impossible to reach idea of the ideal man. Sorry ladies, you'll never find your Matthew McConaughey who cooks, cleans and really means it when he says he's fine with just cuddling and shopping with you is his definition of a good time.
|"Mr. Tyler...going down?" Adam Scott asks Aerosmith's leading man Steven|
Tyler about his career and is not referencing the lame opening to their one song.
Jennifer Westfeldt (Julie) isn't as strong as her male counterpart as her face is plastered in a permanent smile despite her obvious acting prowess. A lot of her emotional scenes are cut dramatically short due to this natural feature. It seemed mean but I laughed every time she cried because her face always looks like it's naturally smiling.
|Believe it or not...she's actually boiling over with rage in this scene.|
|Jon Hamm does a great Popeye impression!|
|He misses his Irish accent.|
|It's been so long since I've seen Burns in a movie, I half-|
expected to see him in the "Those We've Lost This Year" that
airs during the Academy Awards.
|Don't be shocked if it suddenly burns when you pee after looking at this pic.|
Friends with Kids is a romcom that strays from the norm with a story of a progressive duo that, sadly, loses its progressive touch and makes a run for the cliche borders. The movie is funny at times but not riotously so and the performances, when you factor in Fox bringing down the curve, are above average. However, the movie just wasn't as entertaining or humorous enough to give it more than a one-time viewing.